Lecturers from the School of Health Sciences have drawn on their own experience to compile a list of options to support clinical formative assessment and feedback, along with benefits, challenges and alternative suggestions.
Clinical competencies with feedback
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- High quality feedback
- Individual or groups
- Identification of students who need additional support
|
- Costly
- Staff intensive
- Room availability
|
- Use clinical skills facilities, where possible
- Maximise number of students seen in a visit
- Train small number of clinical staff to undertake this role. Moderate feedback / rotate visits
|
Clinical portfolio review
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Developmental
- Student led
- Practice educator &/or academic can review and provide feedback
- Highlights areas that need development / additional experience
|
- Time consuming for students and academic staff / PE
- Does not always reflect true progress
|
- Consider on-line portfolio
- Use of templates &/or rubrics
|
Clinical supervisor / practice educator feedback reports
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Feedback from someone working with the student on placement
- Liaison with clinical placement & HEI
|
- Can lack consistency across a cohort
- Variable skills & experience of PE.
- May not always identify students who need additional support.
|
- Ensure clinical supervisor/ PE is fully trained and supported in the role, to provide constructive, timely feedback.
|
Clinical visits
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- High quality feedback
- Individual or groups
- Identification of students who need additional support
|
- Costly
- Staff intensive
- Room availability
|
- Use clinical skills facilities, where possible
- Maximise number of students seen in a visit
- Train small number of clinical staff to undertake this role. Moderate feedback / rotate visits
|
Formative feedback on clinical skills
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Could be in the HEI or clinical setting
- Can be any trained practice educator (PE)/mentor/practice assessor (PA)/practice supervisor (PS)
- Can use video to inform feedback
- Feedback from service user /patient/client may be included
|
- Needs to be honest constructive feedback
- Useful to have on-going training and support for PE/mentor/ practice assessor (PA)/practice supervisor (PS)
- Difficult to plan in clinical settings / may be cancelled due to pressures in clinical setting
|
- Useful to include some formative feedback within university setting or from one PE/mentor/ practice assessor (PA)/practice supervisor (PS) per clinical site, to ensure consistency
|
Mock OSCEs with academic feedback
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Assess clinical skills
- Monitor team working and ‘soft skills’
- Provides immediate feedback
- Identification of students who need additional support
- Gives students a chance to experience the examination
- Identification of common mistakes or unsafe practice
- Reinforces safe and effective practice in clinical skills
- Gives students an opportunity to reflect on their skills
|
- Staff intensive
- Time consuming
- Lack of consistency between staff on how to perform a clinical skill (may teach it differently)
- Students may not attend if sessions occur outside scheduled timetable hours or when in placement
|
- Develop template feedback / rubrics
- Include some specific comments on areas for improvement
- Suggest students reflect on feedback and produce summary of 3 points to improve on.
|
Mock OSEs
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Gives students a chance to experience the examination
- Provides immediate feedback (if go through the answers at the time)
- Identification of students who need additional support
- May assist student identify their own areas for future learning
|
- Individual feedback / marking can be very time consuming.
- May demoralise a student that has performed badly
|
- Go through the feedback in the group
|
Peer-reviewed OSCE practice
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Less staff intensive
- Gives students ownership / responsibility
- Develops team working and other transferable skills
- Tests the peer reviewer’s knowledge and skills; they need to know the skill to effectively peer review the other student.
|
- Can spread poor practice if students are unsure of the correct procedure.
- Not always going to identify students who need additional support
- May not get constructive feedback
|
- Teach students how to give constructive, supportive feedback
- Identify peers to engage in peer to peer learning & fully support them in the role
- Use examples to ensure understanding of criteria for feedback
- Challenge students to explain their rationale for feedback provided
- Possibly consider use of anonymous peer feedback rubrics / assessment feedback forms
|
Peer-to-peer learning in skills suite
E.g. more experienced students teach newer students &/or pilot co-pilot model
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Gives students ownership
- Develops team working and other transferable skills
- Less staff intensive
- Can give students a wider range of feedback than simply from staff
- May help students’ awareness of standard for assessment, which could help in their own work
|
- Can spread poor practice if students are unsure of the correct procedure.
- Not always going to identify students who need additional support
- May not get constructive feedback
|
- Consider having some peer to peer learning with academic or clinical staff input and review
- Possibly get the students to video activities to review later in groups with a facilitator
|
Role play with debrief and feedback
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Assess a wide range of issues
- Deal with challenging or unusual scenarios
- Provides immediate feedback
|
- Students don’t always like role play
- Can seem artificial
- Time consuming to develop
- Staff intensive
- Students can find them stressful
|
- Enable students to be the service user, to experience the patient perspective
|
Self-marking of clinical skills
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Students reflect on own abilities
|
- May be over critical or overly confident
- Lacks objectivity
- Probably not going to identify students who need additional support
|
- Consider some elements of self and peer review, in addition to staff input, to allow comparisons between perception and reality.
- Consider using film when performing clinical skills and use this as part of the reflective process
|
Simulation with feedback and reflection
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Assess a wide range of issues
- Deal with challenging or unusual scenarios
- Provides immediate feedback
- Encourage self-evaluation
- Students often like simulation
- Allows repetition / revisit difficult areas.
- Enact scenarios in ‘real time’
- Allows students to take risks, call time out, and make mistakes
|
- Costly if equipment needed
- Need to ensure equipment is up to date and reflects what is used in clinical settings
- Can be staff intensive
- ? room availability
- Challenging to create realistic scenarios
- Technical skills required to use equipment / manikins / filming / computers
|
- Some forms of simulation can be for ‘soft skills’
- Use of ‘experts by experience’ can make the simulation more authentic. Service user feedback can help students evaluate their actions on the service user.
- Involvement of students in writing scenarios based on their experiences
|
Vivas
Pros |
Cons |
Alternative suggestions |
- Good way to assess a wide range of issues
- Provides immediate feedback
- Identification of students who need additional support
|
- Staff intensive
- Students can find them stressful
|
- Group viva
- Peer viva
- Co-create questions for vivas, which can be reviewed by students
- Try to use clinical scenarios for viva questions, to ensure link theory to practice.
|
This is a wonderful resource!