by Alexandra Sawyer, Research Fellow, University of Sussex
There are many examples in religion, philosophy, and literature of individuals who have been transformed positively by their experience and struggle with challenging and traumatic events. However, only in the last few decades have researchers begun to research positive changes that individuals report following challenging life events. Positive changes have been documented in a range of individuals following a variety of stressful events, including sexual assault, heart disease, breast cancer, HIV/AIDS, arthritis, terrorist attacks, bereavement, immigration, infertility and natural disasters (see Linley & Joseph, 2004, for a review).
Many different terms have been used in the literature to describe these positive changes but the most commonly used term is posttraumatic growth (PTG). A simple definition of PTG is “positive psychological change as a result of the struggle with life crises or traumatic life events” (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996). However, stressful events, which are not necessarily traumatic, like some illnesses, work-related stress, and immigration have been shown to facilitate PTG. Therefore we prefer to use ‘growth’ to describe the experience of positive change following a challenging event. Three broad areas of growth have been reported in the literature: changes in interpersonal relationships, changes in self-perception, and changes in life-philosophy (Tedeschi, Park, & Calhoun, 1998).
Most research looking at psychological adjustment following childbirth has focused on negative psychological outcomes, whilst positive psychological outcomes have been relatively ignored. However, researchers are beginning to recognise the need to explore a range of possible responses (Allan, Carrick-Sen, & Martin, 2013, Ayers, Joseph, McKenzie-McHarg, Slade, & Wijma, 2009). Aldwin and Levenson (2004) were amongst the first researchers to suggest that developmental events have the potential to promote growth, and it is only in the last few years that research has begun to explore childbirth as one of these events. One qualitative study explored women’s accounts of a subsequent childbirth after a previous traumatic birth and found evidence of one of the domains of growth: a sense of personal strength (Beck & Watson, 2010). Women felt that their previous experience of birth had provided them with a sense of strength and empowerment when dealing with the subsequent birth. Only two studies have looked specifically at growth following childbirth in the UK. In a cross-sectional Internet study (Sawyer & Ayers, 2009) 219 women who had given birth within the previous three years completed the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory; a 21-item questionnaire assessing five areas of positive change (PTGI; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996). Approximately 50% of women reported at least moderate levels of growth and growth scores were comparable to other samples (e.g. victims of assault, accidents) using the PTGI. This study also explored how coping strategies related to growth. Approach coping strategies (e.g. seeking guidance and support) were significantly associated with higher levels of growth. Another study explored growth in a longitudinal, prospective study of women recruited from hospital clinics (Sawyer, Ayers, Bradley, Young, & Smith, 2012). Posttraumatic stress symptoms during pregnancy and type of delivery (elective or emergency caesarean section) significantly predicted higher levels of growth after childbirth. In both of these studies women reported most growth in the Appreciation of Life domain of the PTGI, and the least amount of growth in the Spiritual Change domain.
In my view, assessment of growth following childbirth is important for a number of reasons. Firstly, as mentioned earlier there is an increasing awareness for a broader focus on psychological adjustment following childbirth. If we examine positive and negative psychological outcomes together, a more comprehensive account of adjustment can be developed. Secondly, longitudinal studies in other populations suggest that growth following a challenging event may be associated with better adjustment in the long term. Findings from such studies suggest that growth may be a useful clinical target in clinical and healthcare settings and there are promising studies that demonstrate that growth may be integrated into clinical interventions (see Antoni et al., 2001, Stanton et al., 2002). Therefore the promotion of growth may be a possible option for therapists working with traumatised women. However, until the potential effectiveness of interventions aimed at developing growth has been further explored, caution should be taken when using them clinically with postnatal women. Thirdly, there is a lack of longitudinal, prospective studies of growth. From a theoretical viewpoint childbirth is a naturally occurring and predictable event, which allows the role of different variables in the development of growth to be considered prospectively. Childbirth provides a valuable opportunity to explore how pre-event variables (for example mental health, social support, coping) influences experiences of growth, which can in turn inform current theories of growth.
In this short overview I hope I have illustrated why I think it is important and interesting to widen our focus of psychological adjustment following childbirth to include growth. For those who would like to read further about growth, including theories and measurement, I recommend the papers by Joseph & Linley (2006), Tedeschi & Calhoun (2004), and Zoellner & Maercker (2006).
Dear Alexandra Sawyer,
this was a very interesting and inspiring post, thank you! I think, many people may identify with the theory of growth. Isn’t it even reflected by the proverb: “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”!?
Best wishes,
Susan
I think that growth is an important element to healing from a traumatic birth – and have found that taking positive steps after my traumatic birth, facilitated a shift from feeling disempowered/victimized to that of a survivor.